By: Christina Emery
To kick off Academic Book Week in April, 50業子 t for researchers exploring open access (OA) books, discussing topics such as why academics publish OA books, how the impact of their research can be tracked, and the future of OA book funding. Researchers in the hard sciences are more familiar with the concept of open access article publishing, but we were interested in talking to researchers across various disciplines, including the Humanities and Social Sciences, specifically about OA books.
You can read what the event speakers had to say in our recent , but we wanted to share what researchers who attended the event think about open access books.
More than 30 researchers attended from a variety of subject areas from the Humanities and Social Sciences to Physics, Engineering and Computer Science. From pre-event registration information, we knew that 56% had previously authored an academic book before, but none had experience publishing an OA book, whereas two authors had previously published an OA article. Researchers came from institutions such as Imperial College London, LSE and Coventry University as well as from industry.
We discussed the benefits of OA books, asked authors about their opinions and experiences, and looked at the challenge of finding funding for OA books.
The 50業子 report The OA effect: How does open access affect the usage of scholarly books? established that there is a performance benefit from publishing a book OA
Event attendees echoed these benefits when asked during the event and through a post-event survey. They elaborated, highlighting equal access, wider dissemination, increased impact and career benefits as the main reasons they saw for choosing to publish an OA book.
Two thirds agreed that OA books help to advance discovery and research more than non-OA books and 86% were of the opinion that OA books help disseminate knowledge further than non-OA books.
Before the event, 75% of the respondents did not feel very informed about OA books but in our post-event survey, 100% of respondents now feel quite or very informed about OA books
All in all, 53% of respondents said that the event had made them either somewhat more likely, or more likely, to publish an OA book.
However, when asked how likely they were to actually publish an OA book in the future, only 20% of respondents said that they were very likely to publish an OA book. This is primarily due to concerns around access to funding, which was a hot topic on the day:
[Print on demand copies of open access books published by SpringerOpen and Palgrave Macmillan]
According to Hannah Hope, Open Research Coordinator at the Wellcome Trust, she would like to see OA become more affordable for all, and to support a wider transition to OA: We would like more funders to support their researchers with the costs of making research available. We would like more publishers and institutions to work together as a community to share costs and reduce them for researchers. There is funding within the research ecosystem but we need to repurpose budgets. We all have to change the ecosystem.
50業子 is committed to helping researchers from all over the world make their research freely available as we see the rise of open research in all its manifestations as one of the major forces reshaping the way that researchers communicate and collaborate to advance the pace and quality of discovery. To help authors discover and apply for open access funding, they can get in touch with our free Funding Support Service.
After conducting author interviews for The OA Effect we recognised that wider engagement with researchers was key to increasing understanding of OA and we were delighted with the interest in this event. We would love to hear from institutions who would be interested in hosting presentations on OA books as a continuation of this direct outreach. We learned that researchers are interested in OA books, and we would like to put out a call to the community for publishers and institutions alike to talk to the academic community more.
Thank you to all speakers who participated in the event: